Human rights activist and lawyer Deji Adeyanju has criticised opposition parties for attacking the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over its handling of the ongoing case involving former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice,
Abubakar Malami (SAN), saying their reactions undermine Nigeria’s fight against corruption. Adeyanju spoke to journalists on Monday in Abuja, emphasising that accountability should transcend political affiliations.
Adeyanju expressed disappointment at what he described as hypocrisy and partisan posturing by some opposition figures in response to the EFCC’s actions against Malami, whose conduct since leaving office has drawn public scrutiny and legal examination.
“I am disturbed by what I see as hypocrisy in the reaction of some opposition figures to the arrest of former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN,” he said, stressing that consistent commitment to accountability and the rule of law is essential for national progress.
He argued that opposition parties should focus on demanding transparent and thorough investigations rather than seeking to discredit the EFCC’s mandate or portray the commission as politically biased.
Adeyanju said that if Nigeria is serious about fighting corruption, citizens and political actors must reject defending individuals on the basis of political loyalty. “You cannot claim to desire a better Nigeria while appearing to defend individuals facing serious allegations of corruption,” he said.
According to Adeyanju, allegations made against Malami should be professionally and comprehensively investigated by appropriate authorities, and political rhetoric should not hinder that process.
He urged political actors to avoid attempts to vilify anti-graft institutions, saying the EFCC should be encouraged to execute its mandate professionally and without undue interference.
“What the opposition should be demanding is a transparent and comprehensive investigation, not public attacks on the EFCC or attempts to discredit its actions,” he added.
Although the EFCC has faced various public reactions over its role in high-profile cases, including matters involving Malami, the commission maintains that its operations are guided by evidence and due process — a stance reiterated by EFCC leadership in recent national media interviews.
Observers note that balancing independence, transparency and political sensitivity remains a key challenge for anti-graft institutions amid Nigeria’s evolving legal and political landscape.
Adeyanju also highlighted that the opposition’s role in Nigeria’s democratic system should include peaceful advocacy for accountability and rule of law, rather than defending individuals who are subjects of lawful inquiry.
He said an unbiased application of justice is necessary to strengthen public confidence in the nation’s institutions and to fortify collective efforts against corruption.
The activist’s remarks underscore ongoing national debate over anti-corruption enforcement and political responses, particularly as Nigeria prepares for future electoral contests and as public expectations for institutional integrity continue to rise.
