ADC rejects INEC ruling interpretation as the African Democratic Congress faulted the Independent National Electoral Commission’s position on a recent Court of Appeal judgment concerning its leadership dispute, describing the commission’s stance as inconsistent with facts and due process.
The leadership crisis within the African Democratic Congress has intensified following conflicting claims over the party’s National Working Committee.
The dispute is currently subject to judicial proceedings, with the Court of Appeal issuing directives aimed at preserving the status quo pending final determination.
The controversy escalated after INEC took administrative steps affecting the recognition of party officials, including the removal of certain names from its official records.
The development that ADC rejects INEC ruling arises from the electoral body’s interpretation of the appellate court decision, which has been challenged by the party.
In a statement issued by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the party said ADC rejects INEC ruling interpretation and questioned the basis of the commission’s action.
“We reject INEC’s interpretation of the Court of Appeal ruling,” Abdullahi stated, alleging that the decision did not reflect the actual intent of the judgment.
The party further argued that INEC’s position contained contradictions, noting that it did not align with the facts surrounding the case or the provisions of the court ruling.
“INEC’s press statement is full of contradictions that fly in the face of both facts and reason,” Abdullahi added.
The dispute followed INEC’s decision to remove the names of Senator David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola from its portal as National Chairman and National Secretary of the party.
INEC had earlier explained that its actions were based on the need to comply with the Court of Appeal’s directive to maintain the status quo pending determination of the substantive suit.
The commission stated that it would suspend recognition of the affected leadership structure and refrain from engaging with any faction until the court resolves the matter.
The decision forms part of INEC’s broader responsibility to ensure neutrality in party disputes and adherence to judicial pronouncements.
The party maintained that ADC rejects INEC ruling interpretation because it believes the commission’s action reflects external influence.
Abdullahi alleged that the commission acted under pressure, stating that the decision appeared to favour certain interests over others.
He said: “What is clear… is that INEC has caved to pressure and has chosen to side with the government against the Nigerian people.”
The party also indicated that it is reviewing its options and will announce further steps after consultations.
The development that ADC rejects INEC ruling highlights ongoing tensions surrounding party leadership disputes and the role of electoral institutions in Nigeria.
Such disputes have implications for party administration, participation in electoral processes, and compliance with regulatory frameworks.
The situation also underscores the importance of judicial clarity in resolving internal party conflicts.
The evolving situation may influence broader political alignments, particularly as stakeholders prepare for the 2027 general elections.
